News & Update

- Batman: Arkham Asylum 2 will feature Two-Face, Mr Freeze, Thalia Al Ghul as said by various voice actors who seems to be involved in the project. It also rumored that Robin will join the crew and it will be much darker Batman. Oh boy, I'm sure excited.

- Starcraft 2 getting an Adult Only rating in Korea. Seriously? Starcraft? Adult Only? Given how popular Starcraft is to Koreans, an AO rating will not stop them from playing.

- New iPhone was leaked by Gizmondo. It said to have more squared design and two cameras, one in the front, the other at the back. The resolution is sharper than current iPhone. Rumored to launch this summer 2010.

- PlanetXbox 360 reported Capcom confirmed the development of Marvel vs Capcom 3 at the Capcom Captivate event in Hawaii. The game will have a mix of 2D and 3D much like Street Fighter IV. Some confirmed characters include Wolverine, Spider-Man, Hulk, Magneto and Storm. It is schedule to release on PS3 and Xbox 360 in late 2010 or early 2011. I will surely looking forward for this one.

- Nintendo blames R4 Cartridges for 50% sales drop in Europe. I don't blame them, in my country its more like 99% drop sales because of this R4 thing.
Read more...

Ubisoft is becoming more environmental by ditching printed manual

Ubisoft by today announce that they will stop providing printed manual in their games, instead it will be in game digital version. The digital version promised to have more benefit like more robust manual.

I would say it's really a not bad decision by Ubisoft considering how rarely I need to read manual for the game. The in game tutorial itself is already sophisticated. Secondly if it can help save the environment then why not. I certainly will be pleased to see a more dynamic user manual guide than printed version.

So what do you think? Do you care about printed manual?
Read more...

Is 3D here to stay?

3D suddenly popping out everywhere in our life. Nintendo announced 3DS just a moment ago as its next handheld console with the capability to display 3D image without the use of glasses. And before that Sony is having a big plan for its 3D programme. The PS3 will be given an updated firmware to do play games in 3D in summer and simultaneously release its 3D TV line up, though Samsung already steal some pace and release 3D LED TV in my country.

So with all the sudden, 3D could be becoming part of our lives. The question is, is it here to stay?
For example, just a year ago, in Jakarta, a cinema began to offer some films in 3D mode with double its price. Of course people flocked in to see what is it about. Although many people complains that sometimes they have a headache to see 3D image for hours, the 3D movie proves to be sustainable. Until now, slowly and steadily other cinemas beginning to offer 3D in some of the theatres. 

Looking at the trend, it would be safe to say that 3D market will grow and in the near future, we might have 3D as part of our live. ESPN is beginning to deliver some of its sports channel in 3D mode and I assume other channel will also try and look if there are sustainable demand. Of course it needs time, because in order to watch 3D in your home, you will need a 3D capable TV and people won't immediately change their TV into 3D TV considering new technology always cost more.

However, TV manufacturers are keen to avoid the mistake when HDTV introduced to the market with a really high price. This time, while it is still expensive, the price level is less than HDTV first introduced era to speed up the market penetration.

Verdict? Most likely 3D is here to stay, it is proven that market can accept it and it will grow especially when the technology becoming cheaper and cheaper in the future. But maybe they can do something with the glasses? It just look ridiculous for people watching TV with 3D glasses on. Don't you think?
Read more...

Ex Infintity Wards exec form new studio, join EA partners program. A big blow to Activision

Gaming industry big news today. West and Zampella who fired from Activision, form a new independent studio called Respawn Entertainment. Not only that, they joined EA partners program, in which EA will publish whatever future game they make and Respawn Entertainment will retain and own the IP. 

With Infinity Ward key personnel are leaving, the last being Jon Shiring, a senior programmer since CoD 2, the balance of power in modern FPS is changing. It is still unknown whether the IW personnel who leaves will join Respawn Entertainment, and if I may say it will be very likely.

During recent interveiw, it found out that the disagreement happens way back before the launching of Modern Warfare 2. Firstly, IW didn't like that Treyach just carbon copy their CoD 4 when they make CoD 5. Secondly, the idea of milking CoD every year even though IW make Modern Warfare every two years is not really in tune with IW. Thirdly, Activision won't let IW develop a new IP and want to start immediately develop MW3 and that makes IW disgruntled.

So, what's the next project for Respawn Entertainment? Well, it is definitely not Medal of Honor which many people guessed, because Respawn wants to create something new and own the IP. It looks like that they want to create a game that the universe can extended into comic books or movie, much like Halo franchise. Though they won't guarantee anything.

In the end, with all this mumbo jumbo involving Activision, IW, and Respawn, guess who take the profit? Yes, it is EA ladies and gentlement. EA could be on its way back to status quo being the biggest game producer.
Read more...

Crysis 2 writer sums up Modern Warfare 2 perfectly

Crysis 2 writer Richard Morgan has a say about Modern Warfare 2. Although it is a big hit, the writer feels that it is a "immense dissapointment". Quote from Joystiq:

 "It was a massive stepdown from CoD4. What I thought when I played it was, 'Jesus guys, what have you been doing? You've not ramped anything up. The story is worse and the game doesn't really hang together, it's just a bunch of mission levels. It made no sense. It was totally implausible. It doesn't resolve... I just think they were way too impressed with themselves and that's always a danger. It's just unfortunate."

I couldn't agree more with the comment. From the single player perspective Modern Warfare 2 didn't take any risk in relation to the story. They basically take the old formula which is already stale and put it into the sequel. I remember that my jaw drop when I learn that the hero was killed in CoD 4. And it was so memorable during the last stage when Capt Price throw the gun and let me kill the rest of the baddies.

So when jumping into Modern Warfare 2, everything is so predictable. Capt Price not dead? Check. Our controlled character dead? Check. Actually they did it twice! Fighting the bad guy in the end with slow motion? Check. Plus the story is twisted and twisted, in the end I don't know who's who and what the hell are we fighting against.

In term of story, I really disappointed with Modern Warfare 2. In terms of multiplayer gameplay, yes it is still solid but it really didn't tinker with the formula. The point is, like Richard Morgad said, Activision is way too impressed with themselves and it is always a danger.
Take a look at Battlefield: Bad Company 2. It really fix what's wrong with the first sequel. More teamwork, and the gameplay is more exciting than MW2. My point is Modern Warfare 3 has to change in terms of story and multiplayer perspective, Activision should keep their feet on the ground, don't just rush CoD every year and milk it. They have to improve it because others have catch up.
Read more...

Activision counter suit to ex Infinity Ward Founder is a bit off

We know it just a matter of time before Activision do a counter suit against West and Zampella. In this suit, Activision claimed that West and Zampella conspired with rival competitor (most likely be EA), trying to break away from Activision and form a new studio.

A quote from 1UP.com says this.. 

 The suit, which was filed this morning and aptly described by the Los Angeles Times as reading "more like a dramatic Hollywood script," claims that West and Zampella intentionally prevented Activision from giving bonus money to other Infinity Ward developers "in order to make these employees easier to poach when West and Zampella executed their plans to leave the company and set up their own company."

It is odd. Especially they sentence "West and Zampella intentionally prevented Activision from giving bonus money to other Infinity Ward developers "in order to make these employees easier to poach when West and Zampella..."
Sure, if the money has been given to West and Zampella, and they are not distributing it to the rest of the team, then Activision has a case. But how could you blame others for preventing you from giving others money?? If you had the money, and want to give it to other people, you just give it. Nothing in this world can stop that.

When people are not happy in your company, they will probably looking for another job and it is normal, happens every time. I can understand if West and Zampella is trading company's secret, but gaming industry is about intangible assets. What can you trade? Bunch of source code? It is a creativity industry, you can have the same idea, but depending on how you make it, small details like camera, story, pacing, etc that can make the difference. So it is really depends on how you keep your star players, just like in football.

So they want out, surely if the contract doesn't say that they cannot contact EA, then West and Zampella is breaching the contract and Activision will surely win this legal battle. But if not, then what's the problem?
If Activision wants to keep the rest of Infinity Ward from being pouched, surely a billion dollar company can offer better than new startup company. 
I think Activision and Bobby Kotick is just pissed that they got the Modern Warfare 3 delayed because of this. 
Read more...

Apple announced its own social network called Game Center

Apple has a share of success regarding gaming platform for iPhone and now possibly iPad. To further enhance its infrastructure, taking cue from Xbox Live and PSN, Apple will develop its own gaming social network called 'Game Center'. 

Game Center will feature automatic matchmaking, achievements, leaderboards, and many more. An example of interesting feature will be, let's say a friend wants to challenge you to a game you don't have. You can immediately download/ buy the game.

While Apple didn't specify when this feature will be available, there will be a preview when OS 4 when launches in summer.

It is a right step for Apple to develop gaming social network to enhance its gaming market. It will contribute more value added product into its system, in which at the end more revenue to Apple and game developers.
Read more...